I understand Heather is in D.C. awaiting extradition to Knoxville, Tennessee.  I really don't know what to say at this point other than to reiterate that what Heather was telling people to do was not safe, because so many of us don't have enough knowledge of how the system has worked, and how it works now, to utilize it.  There was obviously something Heather didn't know -- I can't think she would've encouraged Randy Beane to do this without complete knowledge of what could happen.  But anything's possible.

Here is an overview of the charges and penalties related to this case in less "legalese" than most, from the Department of Justice website.

As you will read, the charges carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.

"Violations of § 1956 have a maximum potential twenty year prison sentence and a $500,000 fine or twice the amount involved in the transaction, whichever is greater."

A notice from the New York Federal Reserve was posted (I saw several, one from the FR in Atlanta last week) warning people about this type of transaction.  This was your notice.

It says here, in part:

"The Federal Reserve Banks provide banking services only to banks and governmental entities; individuals do not have accounts at the Federal Reserve. If a Federal Reserve Bank receives a request to make a payment on behalf of an individual, the Federal Reserve Bank will decline to make the payment.  Consumers who have attempted to use Federal Reserve Bank routing numbers to pay their bills will see those transactions rejected or returned, which may result in penalty fees being assessed by the company they were attempting to pay.

Law enforcement, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), is aware of this scheme, and the Federal Reserve Banks, including the New York Fed, have been cooperating with law enforcement in their investigations. Individuals who participate in such schemes could face criminal charges.  

To report instances of fraud relating to these schemes, please e-mail RTN.fraud@ny.frb.org." 

A UCC foreclosure of the systems is one thing.  That's going by lawful and legal channels.  But a series of documents spinning off of that directed to a system that's foreclosed but still operating today --  that say you're "original" and you own something, doesn't make it so unless you know how to notify the system in the way that keeps them from coming after you.  And nothing in those documents achieved that.  There was a chain of custody of the law broken between the UCC foreclosures and Heather's "factualized trust" documentation.  Two different languages, two different systems, two different sets of law.

You are basically trying to force a system that speaks French to switch their operative language to English.  Won't happen.

The collapse of the OPPT Trust is another thing altogether.

How can you draw financial gain from a collapsed trust?

With Trustee status, you can.  But you still can't interact with a banking system that you aren't a part of.  Just because you have some UCC documents that say they were foreclosed upon doesn't mean they're going away on their own.  What's happening now with Heather and Randy is your proof.

You must change your status -- you must remove the presumption that you are a U.S. citizen/employee, taxpayer, voter, slave.  Otherwise, you are breaking their "laws."  

If you don't do your homework before blindly following anyone's instructions, you're taking a huge risk, no matter how good-hearted these people appear to be.

So why are Heather and Randy Beane in prison today?

Because they are still the property of the United States, Incorporated and all its sub-corporations and subsidiaries.  They are operating under their laws and therefore, subject to them.

Like it or not, until you change that status, you will continue to have that status.  If you refuse to do this, you'll suffer the consequences.  This is reality, guys.

These people running the system are desperate to keep control, and they'll do it any way they can.  Right now, their laws are working on their side.  Don't think for a minute they won't use them to harass you, intimidate you, and eventually separate you from your freedom.  You must remove yourself from that scene. 

You are no good to your family, your friends, or humanity while sitting in a federal prison.  You are much more valuable to everyone outside of it.

I will reiterate, using these accounts in the way Heather urged people to use them would never get you access to your entire estate, nor title to YOU or your stuff.  You would continue to be a debtor, federal employee, U.S. citizen, unknowingly assisting to administer perpetual bankruptcies of the United States, Inc. and its sub-corps and subsidiaries. And forcing the issue upon them only gave them reason to push back, and obviously, they did.

If you bought something through this account and registered it, licensed it, or paid tax to the federal government on it, it isn't now and never will be, yours.  I don't care if you have the MSO on your new car -- the way you obtained the car is what they'll get you on.

You can say "but I'm expressing my right to be a child of God, of the Creator/Source energy."  Great.  Where is that going to get you in this environment of laws, slavery, debt?  Where is it written that they have to abide by your wishes, much less care what they are?


What's more concerning to me is, anyone who followed this advice is liable for the same charges -- some even more.  Yesterday I watched a video on facebook of a man who wrote a check to himself and tried to cash it at one of those public check-cashing places.  He was turned down -- and very lucky he wasn't charged with larceny -- yet.  He was trying to pass a "bad check" -- using an account that doesn't belong to him, nor did he have any standing as a "bank" to use it.

I got sick to my stomach.  This man, thinking he was performing a public service, announced on facebook, live, that he was attempting to commit larceny -- and showed how he did it.  What more proof does the system need to convict?

Think about it.  If this was so simple, why haven't we been doing this all along??

And if you think I'm defending the system, think again.  I'm only telling you how it works as I know it -- whether it's right or wrong.  It's your choice, whether you think the Sphere Alliance, or 5D talk, or documents you write up on your own will save you.  I'm here to tell you, they won't.  And if you don't see the evidence sitting right in front of you to prove it, you must not want to know.

You MUST educate yourself.  You are your own best teacher.  This is what we've all been lacking.  It's hard work, and not as fun as watching cartoons, I'll admit it.  But what choice do you have?

Use your head, verify everything, and don't take the word of anyone you know that anything is true if you're not ready to take any risks that come with your choice because you think they mean well.  Intent is one thing, but misinformation based on a need to do someone else a service is another.  They may be misinformed, too.

"I don't have to submit to a system that's criminal" doesn't cut it.  If you don't do it voluntarily, they will force you.  There's no need to submit when you've changed your status.  They can't touch you.

From what I've seen, I've looked at the court docket, read the documents, and will continue to follow -- but seeing that Heather's high level banker / attorney friends have deserted her, I would say this could have been a massive setup.

Like it or not, the OPPT claims are proving themselves to be the secondary creditor status documents Anna von Reitz has talked about.  As more information comes out, this should become clear to all. 

There's no need to take sides here.  We're all working for the same things.  A disagreement in intentions and methods shouldn't lead us into separate groups where one is right and one is wrong.

The mere fact that Heather's high-finance banker friends and high-profile lawyers deserted her in this case should tell you that something isn't right.

Either she was set up for failure, or she's been led to believe that what she is doing is the right thing for all, or she has purposely tried to lead people away from educating themselves on the law before they do anything that might jeopardize their safety.

And this is the irresponsible part of this whole thing.  There was no information given to people who follow Heather's story from her as to what could happen if they pressed the issues and went too far.

As far as Harvey Dent, or Harvey Denson, or whatever other names he goes by, I think he's one of the most dangerous people to deal with right now.  This man obviously thinks he knows things he doesn't.  He's urging people to use a system that doesn't belong to them, to break their laws and put themselves in jeopardy.  I told him yesterday in a comment on Youtube that I hope his channel gets taken down immediately, that he's irresponsible, without knowledge of what he's talking about, and grasping at an audience left behind by Heather to get clicks on his Youtube channel and website.  Pure egomaniac, in my opinion.  And dangerous to those who don't know what they're doing.

Now I want to talk about the "land jurisdiction" that Anna Von Reitz talks about, versus "eternal essence" spoken of by Heather Jarraf.

I am a living, breathing being standing on this planet.  Inside, I have a heart and a soul.  I believe in a Creator / Source whom I hold in reverence and awe as one who is more powerful than I can ever be.

On the one hand, land jurisdiction is me, standing on the ground. I have the right to peace, prosperity, and happiness.

On the other hand, "eternal essence" is what is within me, standing on the ground.  I have the right to peace, prosperity, and happiness.

"Eternal essence embodied" is both.  I have the right to peace, prosperity, and happiness.

Do you see a difference in anything other than terminology?

Think about it. This is about all of us -- not one calling the other an "agent" or "bad guy" or "shill."

I see the very people who are talking about "separation" and lack of "oneness" creating the separation they're complaining about!

This is a series of events that should bring the truth out, one way or the other.  Instead of saying who's right and who's wrong (other than those prompting people to act without knowledge) -- I plan to observe and hope for the best outcome for all.

In the meantime, I am going through the process myself of removing my consent to be considered a U.S. citizen / employee / slave. 

I'll be watching this case so long as the documentation remains on the public record and will post my findings on the blog for anyone who finds it useful.